Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-6696•James Strouse v. Bureau of Prisons
15-6696Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.07.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6696
JAMES STROUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS; K. KIDDY, Unit Manager; BLACKBURN,
Counselor; BERNARDO, SIS; BENNETT, DHO; WHITLEY, Trust Fund
Supervisor; E. D. WILSON, Warden; NEGRONE, SIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00044-REP)
Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 28, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Strouse, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Strouse appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), without prejudice
in part and with prejudice in part. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Strouse v. Bureau of
Prisons, No. 3:13-cv-00044-REP (E.D. Va April 21, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.