Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-6284•Ricky Leander Gamble v. George Kenworthy; Oliver S. Muhammad; Khalil Akbar; Chaplain Hovis
15-6284Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.05.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6284
RICKY LEANDER GAMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE KENWORTHY; OLIVER S. MUHAMMAD; KHALIL AKBAR; CHAPLAIN
HOVIS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CHAPLAIN GIDDIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-ct-03053-F)
Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 27, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Leander Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Leander Gamble appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his claims
alleging Defendants violated his First Amendment rights, as well
as his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized
Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. Gamble v. Kenworthy,
No. 5:12-ct-03053-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2015). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.