Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-6275•Bruce Wayne Koenig v. State of Maryland
15-6275Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.06.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6275
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; J. MICHAEL
STOUFFER; ANNE MADDOX; JON GALLEY; BOBBY SHEARIN; KEITH K.
ARNOLD; LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH; LIEUTENANT PENNINGTON; CHRISTIAN
WEDLOCK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03082-JFM)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Wayne Koenig, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Wayne Koenig appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and related claims.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Koenig v. Maryland, No. 1:13-cv-03082-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 19,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.