Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1825•Raleigh Anderson v. United States of America
15-1825Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.11.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1825
RALEIGH ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; GEORGE MCCONNELL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:15-cv-00003-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 19, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raleigh Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raleigh Anderson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Anderson’s informal brief does not challenge the
bases for the district court’s disposition, Anderson has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly,
we grant Anderson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.