Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1670•Isaac A. Potter, Jr. v. Michelle K. Lee
15-1670Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.09.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1670
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHELLE K. LEE; JENNIFER KRISP; ROBERTA A. BREN; DENISE
DELGIZZIE; TERESA STANEK REA; ERIC MCWILLIAMS; FAITH BAKER;
VALARIE STEVEN; VERONICA P. WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00695-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac A. Potter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Isaac A. Potter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Potter v. Lee, No. 1:15-cv-00695-
LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.