Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1381•Janece P. Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc.; Zaman Khan; Theresa Pond; Susan Mayer
15-1381Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.07.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1381
JANECE P. MICKENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; ZAMAN KHAN; THERESA POND; SUSAN
MAYER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District
Judge. (1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janece P. Mickens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Nicholas Petkovich,
Amanda Vaccaro, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Janece Mickens appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil
complaint for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Mickens leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mickens
v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB (E.D.
Va. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.