Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1346•Kisoka N. Lubula v. Rex Healthcare
15-1346Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.10.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1346
KISOKA N. LUBULA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REX HEALTHCARE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00822-BO)
Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Japheth N. Matemu, MATEMU LAW OFFICE P.C., Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Kevin S. Joyner, J. Allen Thomas,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kisoka Ngely Lubula appeals the district court’s order
granting Rex Healthcare’s summary judgment motion on her claims
alleging she was constructively discharged, discriminated
against and harassed on the basis of her race and national
origin, and retaliated against for complaining of adverse
treatment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. Lubula v. Rex
Healthcare, No. 5:13-cv-00822-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.