Kenneth A. White v. LEROY SCOTT OWENS, VP, Old Republic National Title Insurance

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1312
KENNETH A. WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LEROY SCOTT OWENS, VP, Old Republic National Title
Insurance; CHAGRIN VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW AGENCY; GENERAL
TITLE & TRUST COMPANY; DOUGLAS KING, Esq.; STEPHEN D.
STEINOUR, CEO, Chairman, President, Huntington National
Bank; ROGER CASALE, VP, Sky Bank (bought by Huntington Nat’l
Bank in 2007); RYAN HOWARD, Mortgage Loan Originator, Sky
Bank (bought by Huntington Nat’l Bank in 2007); ROBERT
ROSPLOCK, Esq.; NANCY LUXENBERG; MONICA E. RUSSELL, Attorney
at Law; DANIEL A. FRIEDLANDER; ROBERT H. YOUNG, Esq.;
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK; ONE THROUGH TWENTY JOHN & JANE
DOES; OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE, 400 Second
Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401, and; OLD
REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE; TITLE HOLDINGS,
LTD/CHARGIN VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW AGENCY; SKY
BANK/HUNTINGTON NAT’L BANK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-07965)
Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 6, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth A. White, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth A. White, a federal inmate, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012),
White’s second amended complaint filed in his civil action. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. White v. Owens, No. 1:12-cv-07965 (S.D. W. Va. March 12,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --