Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1216•Sheryl Starliper, for Eric Glen Starliper, Deceased v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
15-1216Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.10.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1216
SHERYL STARLIPER, for Eric Glen Starliper, Deceased,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security
Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:13-cv-03646-CCB)
Submitted: September 30, 2015 Decided: October 13, 2015
Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christine P. Benagh, COLLIER-BENAGH LAW, P.L.L.C., Washington,
D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney,
Jay C. Hinsley, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sheryl Starliper appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding
the Commissioner’s denial of her husband’s application for
disability insurance benefits.* Our review of the Commissioner’s
determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are
supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law
was applied. See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir.
2015). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the
administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no
reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Starliper’s
motion to file a supplemental appendix, we affirm the district
court’s judgment. Starliper v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-03646-CCB
(D. Md. Jan. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Sheryl Starliper was substituted as the party in interest
after the claimant’s death.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.