Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1206•Lawrence Little v. Donal Estes; Herbert Segar; Brandon Chambers; Cedricot Booth
15-1206Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.06.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1206
LAWRENCE LITTLE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DONAL ESTES; HERBERT SEGAR; BRANDON CHAMBERS; CEDRICOT
BOOTH, Defendants – Appellees,
and
EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE STATION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01514-WDQ)
Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Little, Appellant Pro Se. Chaz Romeo Ball, Michael
Lawrence Marshall, SCHLACHMAN, BELSKY & WEINER, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland; Kara Kiminsky Lynch, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Little appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint as barred by res judicata. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Little v. Estes, No. 1:13-cv-01514-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 24,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.