Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Maryland, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1130
RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,
Defendant.
No. 15-1131
RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 15-1132
RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT)
Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda
C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad
Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her
motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v.
McDonald’s Rest. of Md., Inc., Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-
03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --