Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1051•Branch Bank and Trust Company v. Cathy G. Lanier; Randy D. Lanier
15-1051Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.06.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1051
BRANCH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CATHY G. LANIER; RANDY D. LANIER,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-01318-JFA)
Submitted: June 4, 2015 Decided: June 17, 2015
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cathy G. Lanier; Randy D. Lanier, Appellants Pro Se. Steven
Barry Licata, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
Appellants Cathy G. Lanier and Randy D. Lanier appeal the
district court’s order denying reconsideration of the court’s
earlier order denying reconsideration of the court’s judgment.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Branch Bank & Trust Co. v. Lanier, No. 3:13-cv-
01318-JFA (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2014). We deny Appellants’ pending
motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.