Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1033
JOSE LUIS LARIOS-ALVAREZ,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: August 25, 2015 Decided: September 29, 2015
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay S. Marks, Lauren Gold, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC,
Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer,
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan,
Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jose Luis Larios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration
judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the parties’
Joint Statement of Agreed Facts and all supporting evidence. We
conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8
U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502
U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. In re: Larios-Alvarez (B.I.A. Dec.
19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --