Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1013•Alvia L. Lacy v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak; LARRY TAYLOR
15-1013Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.04.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1013
ALVIA L. LACY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak; LARRY
TAYLOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00179-RDB)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvia L. Lacy, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J.
Delany, Andrew George Sakallaris, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alvia L. Lacy appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179-
RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.