Earl Graves v. LIEUTENANT HALLOWELL; T. HAMILTON, Food Services Manager; THOMAS ASBELL, Superintendent

14-7444Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.04.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7444
EARL GRAVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT HALLOWELL; T. HAMILTON, Food Services Manager;
THOMAS ASBELL, Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:13-ct-03152-D)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Maria Estevez, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Graves appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing
Graves’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he has filed an
application to proceed in forma pauperis. Limiting our review
to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R.
34(b), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant Graves’ application to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. Graves v. Hallowell, No.
5:13-ct-03152-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.