United States of America v. Jeffrey Grant Prysock

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7374
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY GRANT PRYSOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cr-00171-HMH-1; 7:14-cv-02908-HMH)
Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Grant Prysock, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Grant Prysock appeals the district court’s order
construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it for lack of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Prysock, Nos.
7:11-cr-00171-HMH-1; 7:14-cv-02908-HMH (D.S.C. filed July 21,
2014; entered July 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --