Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-7278•United States of America v. Mike Aziz Merzoug
14-7278Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.07.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7278
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Respondent,
v.
MIKE AZIZ MERZOUG,
Defendant - Petitioner.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:10-cr-00131-HMH-2)
Submitted: June 12, 2015 Decided: July 2, 2015
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan A. Bartell, Cleveland, Ohio, for Petitioner. William
N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
David C. Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mike Aziz Merzoug appeals the district court’s oral order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Bereano
v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating
standard of review for denial of petition for writ of coram
nobis). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.