Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-7000•Kevin Fauntleroy v. TED HULL, Superintendent of NNRJ
14-7000Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.11.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7000
KEVIN FAUNTLEROY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TED HULL, Superintendent of NNRJ; LYNN SUDDUTH, now known
as Lynn Marie Resler, Ms., Captian/Head of Medical; CAROLYN
NEAL, Ms., LP/RN Head Nurse of Medical,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; KEN CUCCINELLI, VA Attorney
General,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00858-JAG)
Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Fauntleroy, Appellant Pro Se. Grant Edward Kronenberg,
MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Fauntleroy appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Fauntleroy v. Hull, No. 3:11-cv-00858-JAG (E.D. Va.
June 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.