United States of America v. Todd Lamar Moss

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6673
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TODD LAMAR MOSS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:05-cr-00526-HMH-3; 7:98-cr-00610-HMH-1)
Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd Lamar Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Todd Lamar Moss appeals the district court’s order
denying his “motion to clarify the original intent regarding
concurrent sentences” and a subsequent text order denying his
motion to amend/correct the previous order. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Moss, No. 7:05-cr-00526-HMH-3; 7:98-cr-00610-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Mar.
25, 2014 & Apr. 14, 2014). We further deny Moss’s motion to
supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --