Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-6661•Calvin Lyndale Gaddy v. THE SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COURTS, For recusal/bias, For Bivens Action/Prejudices
14-6661Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.09.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6661
CALVIN LYNDALE GADDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COURTS, For recusal/bias, For
Bivens Action/Prejudices,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02387-JFA)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy appeals the district court’s
orders adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
and dismissing his civil complaint, and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gaddy v. S.C. Dist. Courts, No. 8:13-cv-02387-JFA
(D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2014; Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.