United States of America v. Deonza Lamar Carmichael

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6205
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DEONZA LAMAR CARMICHAEL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL)
Submitted: May 28, 2015 Decided: June 4, 2015
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deonza Lamar Carmichael, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P.
May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Deonza Lamar Carmichael appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Carmichael, No. 5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL
(E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2014); see also United States v. Foote,
__F.3d__, 2015 WL 1883538 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015), petition for
cert. filed (May 12, 2015) (No. 14-9792). We deny Carmichael’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --