Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-2319•Luis D. Cabrera Mejia v. Wal-Mart
14-2319Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.04.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2319
LUIS D. CABRERA MEJIA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00237-TDS-JEP)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis D. Cabrera Mejia, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Byrd Cummings,
Molly Mitchell Shah, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Luis D. Cabrera Mejia appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and
dismissing Mejia’s employment discrimination case with
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Mejia v. Wal-Mart, No. 1:14-cv-00237-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.