Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-2196•Demetra Milladge v. Oto Development, LLC
14-2196Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.07.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2196
DEMETRA MILLADGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OTO DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00194-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: June 30, 2015 Decided: July 22, 2015
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Teresa Burke Wright, Meredith F.
Bergeson, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Demetra Milladge appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of OTO Development, LLC, in her
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Milladge v. OTO Development, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00194-CMH-
JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.