Rose Ure Mezu v. Morgan State University

14-1911Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.09.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1911
ROSE URE MEZU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; ARMADA W. GRANT, in her personal
capacity and as Director, Human Resources/Payroll for Morgan
State University; DOLAN HUBBARD, in his personal capacity
and as Chair, Department of English and Language Arts,
Morgan State University,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:09-cv-02855-WMN; 1:11-cv-03072-WMN)
Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
C. Valerie Ibe, LAW OFFICES OF C. VALERIE IBE, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of
Maryland, Thomas Faulk, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rose Ure Mezu appeals the district court’s judgment and its
order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59
motions, after a jury found in Defendants’ favor on Mezu’s
claims alleging retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (2012), and retaliation in violation of, and
interference with her rights guaranteed by, the Family and
Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2012). We have
considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment and order. Mezu v. Morgan State
Univ., Nos. 1:09-cv-02855-WMN; 1:11-cv-03072-WMN (D. Md. filed
Jun. 13, 2014, entered Jun. 23, 2014; Aug. 21, 2014. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.