Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1891•Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss v. American Regent, Inc.; Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
14-1891Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.04.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1891
NANCY A. SCHMITT-DOSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LTD OF JAPAN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: March 24, 2015 Decided: April 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Loftis,
WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants on her complaint seeking
damages for personal injuries under Virginia tort law. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Schmitt-Doss v. Am. Regent, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB
(W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.