John M. Barnes v. Artex Fine Art Services

14-1692Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.10.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1692
JOHN M. BARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARTEX FINE ART SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:14-cv-00040-RWT)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, Alex
Chad Weinstein, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John M. Barnes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint alleging age discrimination as untimely
and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
Barnes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Artex Fine Art
Servs., No. 8:14-cv-00040-RWT (D. Md. filed June 9, 2014;
entered June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.