Mike Willoughby v. Henrico County

14-1673Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.10.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1673
MIKE WILLOUGHBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRICO COUNTY; OWEN I. ASHMAN; LEE A. HARRIS, JR.;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; HENRICO COUNTY COMMONWEALTH'S
ATTORNEY OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00223-HEH)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike Willoughby, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Ramsey Newby, OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Henrico, Virginia; Sherry A. Fox,
THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Erin Rose McNeill,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Mike Willoughby appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2012),
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and state negligence law. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Willoughby v. Henrico Cnty., No. 3:14-cv-00223-HEH (E.D. Va.
June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.