Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1605•Veda Pryor v. JOHN M. MCHUGH, Department of the Army, Agency
14-1605Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.10.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1605
VEDA PRYOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN M. MCHUGH, Department of the Army, Agency; SETH D.
HARRIS, (Acting) Department of Labor (OWCP) Agency,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-
cv-01269-PWG)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veda Pryor, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, Allen
F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Veda Pryor appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Pryor in forma
pauperis status, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Pryor v. McHugh, No. 8:13-cv-01269-PWG (D. Md.
May 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.