Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1457•Alfred G. Gage v. Golden Corral Corporation
14-1457Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.09.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1457
ALFRED G. GAGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00132-F)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alfred G. Gage, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, POYNER
SPRUILL LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alfred G. Gage appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendant and dismissing his
civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gage v.
Golden Corral Corp., No. 5:13-cv-00132-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.