Banoro Garrett v. Lieutenant R. H. Weiler

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1364
BANORO GARRETT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER; SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; ROBERT J.
MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; JANEL
CUMMINGS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFF’S
OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO;
OFFICER H. G. WHITE; SERGEANT G. SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; L.
WILLIS; P. BELL; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 28, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN,
CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Ruth Griggs,
Joel Mark McCray, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Banoro Garrett appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Garrett v. Weiler, No. 2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va.
filed Mar. 25 & entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --