Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1351•Mary Ann Alameda v. JOHN O. BRENNAN, Director of Central Intelligence Agency
14-1351Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.09.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1351
MARY ANN ALAMEDA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN O. BRENNAN, Director of Central Intelligence Agency;
BETTY SAPP, Director of National Reconnaissance Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:13-cv-01363-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Ann Alameda, Appellant Pro Se. Antonia Marie Konkoly,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Alameda appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice her civil action alleging
employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Alameda v. Brennan, No. 1:13-cv-
01363-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.