Michael Little v. Hook Tire & Service, Inc.

14-1341Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.10.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1341
MICHAEL LITTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOOK TIRE & SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00521-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Geraldine Sumter, FERGUSON, CHAMBERS & SUMTER, P.A., Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen D. Dellinger, Kevin P.
Murphy, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Little appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in
Little’s action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012).
We have reviewed the record, the briefs filed by the parties,
and the district court’s order, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Little v. Hook Tire & Serv., Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00521-
FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.