Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1306•Reginald B. Stewart v. United States of America
14-1306Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.10.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1306
REGINALD B. STEWART,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CELINA M. INMAN; VALERIE A. HUTTON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-
cv-03610-PWG)
Submitted: September 22, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eden Brown Gaines, BROWN GAINES, LLC, White Plains, Maryland,
for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney,
Victor M. Lawrence, Special Assistant United States Attorney,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court’s order
denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart
v. United States, No. 8:13-cv-03610-PWG (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.