Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1177•Walter Clayton Ruff, Jr. v. MATT BOWERS, Sergeant
14-1177Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.05.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1177
WALTER CLAYTON RUFF, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATT BOWERS, Sergeant; WESLEY BOLAND, Captain; NICK
BOUKNIGHT, Investigator; JAMES LEE FOSTER, Newberry County
Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-03522-MGL)
Submitted: May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Clayton Ruff, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Vinton D. Lide,
Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE & PAULEY, LLC, Lexington, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter Clayton Ruff, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ruff v. Bowers, No. 8:12-cv-03522-MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 19,
2014). We further deny Ruff’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.