Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1046•Chigozie M. Enoch v. Advanced Bioscience Laboratories, Inc.
14-1046Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.06.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1046
CHIGOZIE M. ENOCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ADVANCED BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-03701-JKB)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chigozie M. Enoch, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Rigatuso,
John S. Vander Woude, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chigozie M. Enoch appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in his civil
action alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Enoch v. Advanced Bioscience
Labs., Inc., No. 8:12-cv-03701-JKB (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.