Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1028•Johnny Belsome v. PAUL R. BURKS; REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com
14-1028Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.10.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1028
JOHNNY BELSOME; TIMOTHY ALLEN; JODY HINKLEY; DONALD MARCEL;
KEITH HINKLEY; STARR ATCHISON; EDWARD THIEL; BRETT HUNTER;
TARA BELSOME, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
PAUL R. BURKS; REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a
Zeekrewards.com,
Defendants – Appellees,
KENNETH D. BELL, as the appointed Receiver of Rex Venture
Group, LLC et al.,
Intervenor – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00800-GCM)
Submitted: September 29, 2014 Decided: October 10, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marc R. Michaud, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellants. Noell
P. Tin, Jacob H. Sussman, TIN, FULTON, WALKER & OWEN, PLLC,
Charlotte, North Carolina; Irving M. Brenner, Kenneth D. Bell,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Matthew E. Orso, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the district court’s order
denying a motion to lift the stay imposed in the underlying
Receivership. We have reviewed the record included on appeal,
as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no abuse of discretion
by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Belsome v. Burks, No. 3:12-cv-
00800-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.