United States of America v. Christopher Ray Parrish

13-8062Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.03.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8062
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTOPHER RAY PARRISH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:08-cr-00099-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00166-FL)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Ray Parrish, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley,
Evan Rikhye, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Ray Parrish appeals the district court’s
order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Parrish, No. 5:08-cr-00099-FL-1
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.