Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-8060•Darryl L. Cook v. United States of America; Eugene K. Carlton
13-8060Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.04.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8060
DARRYL L. COOK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; EUGENE K. CARLTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (0:13-cv-02524-RMG-PJG)
Submitted: April 7, 2014 Decided: April 16, 2014
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl L. Cook, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl L. Cook appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for
failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. United
States, No. 0:13-cv-02524-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We
deny the motion to place case in abeyance and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.