Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-8053•Kevin S. Jackson v. Circuit Court for Howard County
13-8053Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.04.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8053
KEVIN S. JACKSON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03219-RDB)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin S. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cir. Ct.
of Howard Cnty., No. 1:13-cv-03219-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 4, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.