Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-7895•Ricky Gamble v. William Bullard; Sergeant Green; Officer Gaddy
13-7895Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7895
RICKY GAMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BULLARD; SERGEANT GREEN; OFFICER GADDY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
OFFICER CRIBB,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03220-FL)
Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Gamble appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint, and has also filed a motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.
Gamble v. Bullard, No. 5:11-ct-03220-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.