United States of America v. Larry Martin Cain, a/k/a DUKE

13-7886Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.04.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7886
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LARRY MARTIN CAIN, a/k/a DUKE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-16)
Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014
Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Martin Cain, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr.,
Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Martin Cain appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the specific performance of the
plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Cain, No. 4:09-cr-
00073-TLW-16 (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.