Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-7836•United States of America v. Preston Cornelius Everett, a/k/a P
13-7836Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7836
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PRESTON CORNELIUS EVERETT, a/k/a P,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00019-LMB-1)
Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Preston Cornelius Everett, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente,
Acting United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Preston Cornelius Everett appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to correct a clerical error pursuant to
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Everett, No. 1:05-cr-00019-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.