Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-7440•Angelo Karon Williams, sui juris, Freeman v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., his official capacity as: Attorney General for United States
13-7440Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit06.03.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7440
ANGELO KARON WILLIAMS, sui juris, Freeman,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., his official capacity as: Attorney
General for United States; REX W. COFFEY, In his official
capacity as: Sheriff for Charles County Maryland; ROD J.
ROSENSTEIN, In his official capacity as: Attorney for
United States Court; WILLIAM MOOMAU, In his official
capacity as: Assistant Attorney for the United States
District Court; PETER J. MESSITTE, In his official capacity
as: Judge for the United States District Court,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-
cv-00252-PWG)
Submitted: February 25, 2014 Decided: March 6, 2014
Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo Karon Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Angelo Karon Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Williams v. Holder, No. 8:13-cv-00252-
PWG (D. Md. Aug. 16, 2013). We deny Williams’ motions to amend
the caption and for summary judgment/show cause hearing and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.