Tessa R. R. G. C. Childress, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne Childress v. Charleston County Sheriff’s Office

13-7066Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.09.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7066
TESSA R. R. G. C. CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne
Childress,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; DANA E HERRON,
Inspector; INTERNAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL
STANDARDS, The Charleston County Sheriff’s Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cv-01008-SB)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tessa R R G C Childress, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tessa R.R.G.C. Childress appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Childress v. Charleston Cnty. Sheriff’s Office, No.
2:13-cv-01008-SB (D.S.C. June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.