Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-7053•Steven Louis Barnes v. Gregory William Seigler; Lt. Mark Howard
13-7053Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.09.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7053
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GREGORY WILLIAM SEIGLER; LT. MARK HOWARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-cv-01156-MBS)
Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Barnes’ claims against Appellee
Gregory William Seigler and granting summary judgment on Barnes’
claims against Appellee Mark Howard in favor of Howard, and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Barnes v. Seigler, No.
5:11-cv-01156-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2012; June 6, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.