Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-6992•James Robinson v. KAREN FRYAR, Solicitor
13-6992Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.09.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6992
JAMES ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAREN FRYAR, Solicitor; VANESSA COOPER, Solicitor; WARREN
GIESE, Solicitor; JOHN BREEDEN, JR., Judge; INVESTIGATOR G.
BURNS, CPD; DONNA STROM, Judge Family Court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:12-cv-03505-JFA)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Robinson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice Robinson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint and a subsequent order denying Robinson’s motion to
amend and/or for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Fryar, No.
3:12-cv-03505-JFA (D.S.C. filed Apr. 9, 2013 & entered Apr. 10,
2013; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.