Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-6841•Bobby Ray Grady v. BRANSON VICKORY, III, District Attorney; ARNOLD JONES, Superior Court Judge
13-6841Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.10.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6841
BOBBY RAY GRADY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRANSON VICKORY, III, District Attorney; ARNOLD JONES,
Superior Court Judge,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
KEITH ROUSE; DANYA M. STRONG, District Attorney; WAYNE
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03212-FL)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Ray Grady, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Ray Grady appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we grant Grady’s
motion to dismiss a party, deny his motion for summary
disposition, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. Grady v. Vickory, No. 5:11-ct-03212-FL
(E.D.N.C. May 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.