Franklin C. Smith v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge

13-6413Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.06.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6413
FRANKLIN C. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge;
WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR., Chief Circuit Judge; J. HARVIE
WILKINSON, III, Circuit Judge; PAUL V. NIEMEYER, Circuit
Judge; BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge; DIANA GRIBBON
MOTZ, Circuit Judge; SAMUEL W. PHILLIPS, Judicial Council
Member,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00043-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: May 6, 2013 Decided: June 11, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court’s order
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Davis, No. 2:13-
cv-00043-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We deny Smith’s
motion to transfer venue. See Bolin v. Story, 225 F.3d 1234,
1238-39 (11th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.