Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-6352•United States of America v. Malcolm Carl Young
13-6352Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.05.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6352
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MALCOLM CARL YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (5:09-cr-00036-GEC-JGW-1)
Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 31, 2013
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Carl Young, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, Jeb
Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Carl Young appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Young, No. 5:09-cr-00036-GEC-
JGW-1 (W.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.