Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-6172•Antrell Jermaine Fordham, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a Antrell J. Fordham v. DR. MOORE; MRS. L. MAUNEY; MRS. E. HOLCOMB, individual and official capacities
13-6172Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.04.2013
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6172
ANTRELL JERMAINE FORDHAM, a/k/a Antrell Fordham, a/k/a
Antrell J. Fordham,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. MOORE; MRS. L. MAUNEY; MRS. E. HOLCOMB, individual and
official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge.
(2:12-cv-00974-MGL)
Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antrell Jermaine Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Shelton Webber
Haile, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antrell Jermaine Fordham appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Fordham v. Moore, No. 2:12-cv-00974-MGL (D.S.C.
Jan. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.